Thinking with autoethnography in collaborative research: A critical, reflexive approach to relational ethics

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Thinking with autoethnography in collaborative research : A critical, reflexive approach to relational ethics. / Phillips, Louise Jane; Christensen-Strynø, Maria Bee; Frølunde, Lisbeth.

I: Qualitative Research, Bind 22, Nr. 5, 2022, s. 761-776.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Phillips, LJ, Christensen-Strynø, MB & Frølunde, L 2022, 'Thinking with autoethnography in collaborative research: A critical, reflexive approach to relational ethics', Qualitative Research, bind 22, nr. 5, s. 761-776. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211033446

APA

Phillips, L. J., Christensen-Strynø, M. B., & Frølunde, L. (2022). Thinking with autoethnography in collaborative research: A critical, reflexive approach to relational ethics. Qualitative Research, 22(5), 761-776. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211033446

Vancouver

Phillips LJ, Christensen-Strynø MB, Frølunde L. Thinking with autoethnography in collaborative research: A critical, reflexive approach to relational ethics. Qualitative Research. 2022;22(5):761-776. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211033446

Author

Phillips, Louise Jane ; Christensen-Strynø, Maria Bee ; Frølunde, Lisbeth. / Thinking with autoethnography in collaborative research : A critical, reflexive approach to relational ethics. I: Qualitative Research. 2022 ; Bind 22, Nr. 5. s. 761-776.

Bibtex

@article{dd9e40dea79949e195579cc9527bb87b,
title = "Thinking with autoethnography in collaborative research: A critical, reflexive approach to relational ethics",
abstract = "In this article, we propose a distinctive critical, reflexive approach to relational ethics in {\textquoteleft}collaborative, democratic and transformative{\textquoteright} research. Underpinning the approach is the view that the buzzwords of {\textquoteleft}collaboration{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}co-creation/co-production{\textquoteright} may signify equitable, symmetrical power relations and, as a result, romanticise collaborative research as straightforward processes of inclusion. The approach integrates critical, reflexive analysis of the play of power in the {\textquoteleft}with{\textquoteright} in {\textquoteleft}research with, not on, people{\textquoteright} and the {\textquoteleft}co{\textquoteright} in {\textquoteleft}co-creating knowledge{\textquoteright} into the ongoing collaborative research process. As a main method for critical, reflexive analysis, the approach uses {\textquoteleft}thinking with{\textquoteright} autoethnography. In the article, we illustrate the approach by showing how we {\textquoteleft}think with{\textquoteright} autoethnographic texts to respond to discomfort and analyse thetensions in the co-constitution of knowledge and subjectivities in the preliminary phase of a collaborative, participatory research project on dance for people with Parkinson{\textquoteright}s disease and their spouses.",
author = "Phillips, {Louise Jane} and Christensen-Stryn{\o}, {Maria Bee} and Lisbeth Fr{\o}lunde",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1177/14687941211033446",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "761--776",
journal = "Qualitative Research",
issn = "1468-7941",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thinking with autoethnography in collaborative research

T2 - A critical, reflexive approach to relational ethics

AU - Phillips, Louise Jane

AU - Christensen-Strynø, Maria Bee

AU - Frølunde, Lisbeth

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - In this article, we propose a distinctive critical, reflexive approach to relational ethics in ‘collaborative, democratic and transformative’ research. Underpinning the approach is the view that the buzzwords of ‘collaboration’ and ‘co-creation/co-production’ may signify equitable, symmetrical power relations and, as a result, romanticise collaborative research as straightforward processes of inclusion. The approach integrates critical, reflexive analysis of the play of power in the ‘with’ in ‘research with, not on, people’ and the ‘co’ in ‘co-creating knowledge’ into the ongoing collaborative research process. As a main method for critical, reflexive analysis, the approach uses ‘thinking with’ autoethnography. In the article, we illustrate the approach by showing how we ‘think with’ autoethnographic texts to respond to discomfort and analyse thetensions in the co-constitution of knowledge and subjectivities in the preliminary phase of a collaborative, participatory research project on dance for people with Parkinson’s disease and their spouses.

AB - In this article, we propose a distinctive critical, reflexive approach to relational ethics in ‘collaborative, democratic and transformative’ research. Underpinning the approach is the view that the buzzwords of ‘collaboration’ and ‘co-creation/co-production’ may signify equitable, symmetrical power relations and, as a result, romanticise collaborative research as straightforward processes of inclusion. The approach integrates critical, reflexive analysis of the play of power in the ‘with’ in ‘research with, not on, people’ and the ‘co’ in ‘co-creating knowledge’ into the ongoing collaborative research process. As a main method for critical, reflexive analysis, the approach uses ‘thinking with’ autoethnography. In the article, we illustrate the approach by showing how we ‘think with’ autoethnographic texts to respond to discomfort and analyse thetensions in the co-constitution of knowledge and subjectivities in the preliminary phase of a collaborative, participatory research project on dance for people with Parkinson’s disease and their spouses.

U2 - 10.1177/14687941211033446

DO - 10.1177/14687941211033446

M3 - Journal article

VL - 22

SP - 761

EP - 776

JO - Qualitative Research

JF - Qualitative Research

SN - 1468-7941

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 315176093